| |
| |
|
|


 |
Introduction
This study was motivated by the wide variations in the output
of cotton between 1976 and 1995, given that estimated domestic
resource cost ratio for cotton production was 0.6, indicating
the country’s comparative advantage in the use of labour
and capital in cotton production. Building on earlier research
findings that level of price incentives was one of the most
important factors that influence cotton supply, the author
justified studying the underlying factors that determine prices
themselves. One such factor is the real exchange rate, which
affects the transmission of changes in world price of lint
to the domestic prices of lint and seed cotton.
The real exchange rate
is said to be misaligned if it is not equal to the equilibrium
exchange rate. Such misalignment has its root in monetary,
fiscal, trade and exchange rate policies. The real exchange
rate misalignment be an overvaluation of domestic currency
which serves as a tax on prices of traded goods; in the case
of overvaluation, it exchange rate misalignment serves as
a subsidy. That economic policies influence price incentives
through the RER and play a very important role in agricultural
development is well documented (Bautista, 1987; Mundlak et
al. 1990; Fosu, 1992 and Fosu, 1994). Kruega (1992) in a study
of policies in selected African countries, including Ghana,
found that macro policies, including those on the exchange
rate, taxed agricultural producers in sub-Sahara Africa by
28.6 percent on average; the implicit tax through direct agricultural
policies, was 23 percent. Click
for more... -pdf doc |
| |
.......... |
.....(requires
login -members only) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|